Sunday, March 29, 2009 at 9:34AM | in
World Development -->
Right now, I'm browsing through The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life, by Paul Seabright. He basically tries to explain, from the perspective of evolutionary biology, why humans have developed complex economies that are based upon trust and recriprocity with strangers:Human social organization has been able, as we have seen, to exploit the advantages of large groups because of exchange between unrelated individuals. But we still need to understand how this widespread reliance on exchange has been possible. It is virtually unknown in the rest of the animal kingdom, and it involves important risks. Only rarely do two individuals make simultaneous exchange of goods or favours of a known value. Much more commonly there is a favour extended by one in return for compensating favour at a later date...[But] how can you be sure that I will keep my promise?...
In short, and whatever the precise evolutionary origins of such behaviour, the potential costs of being cheated have become dangerously high for human beings dealing with nonrelatives. Not only may you never be repaid for the mammoth meat you gave me, but you may be murdered in return.
Sunday, March 29, 2009 at 9:34AM | in
World Development
Reader Comments (2)
You're right! I too am tired of hearing that the roots of human behaviour lie mainly or only in our genes.
Most of (all?) our desires are genetically and/or developmentally 'programmed'. we can act on them or not, cultivate them or not. The question is whether our physical/psychological desires are all that we are or that we also have *real* conscience/conscienceness that is independent of these desires and make us uniquely human, uniquely responsible and potentially magnificent creatures. Somehow I suspect that even materialists among us act out of that conscience even when denying it.